You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dietary Fat Intake and the Risk of Depression: The SUN Project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0016268 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Almudena Sánchez-Villegas, Lisa Verberne, Jokin De Irala, Miguel Ruíz-Canela, Estefanía Toledo, Lluis Serra-Majem, Miguel Angel Martínez-González |
| Abstract |
Emerging evidence relates some nutritional factors to depression risk. However, there is a scarcity of longitudinal assessments on this relationship. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 232 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 70 | 30% |
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Kuwait | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 215 | 93% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 318 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 63 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 7% |
| Researcher | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 19% |
| Unknown | 75 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 10% |
| Psychology | 33 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 49 | 15% |
| Unknown | 85 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 477. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#57,692
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#975
of 225,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181
of 196,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#8
of 1,312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.