↓ Skip to main content

It Takes Two–Skilled Recognition of Objects Engages Lateral Areas in Both Hemispheres

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
It Takes Two–Skilled Recognition of Objects Engages Lateral Areas in Both Hemispheres
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Merim Bilalić, Andrea Kiesel, Carsten Pohl, Michael Erb, Wolfgang Grodd

Abstract

Our object recognition abilities, a direct product of our experience with objects, are fine-tuned to perfection. Left temporal and lateral areas along the dorsal, action related stream, as well as left infero-temporal areas along the ventral, object related stream are engaged in object recognition. Here we show that expertise modulates the activity of dorsal areas in the recognition of man-made objects with clearly specified functions. Expert chess players were faster than chess novices in identifying chess objects and their functional relations. Experts' advantage was domain-specific as there were no differences between groups in a control task featuring geometrical shapes. The pattern of eye movements supported the notion that experts' extensive knowledge about domain objects and their functions enabled superior recognition even when experts were not directly fixating the objects of interest. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) related exclusively the areas along the dorsal stream to chess specific object recognition. Besides the commonly involved left temporal and parietal lateral brain areas, we found that only in experts homologous areas on the right hemisphere were also engaged in chess specific object recognition. Based on these results, we discuss whether skilled object recognition does not only involve a more efficient version of the processes found in non-skilled recognition, but also qualitatively different cognitive processes which engage additional brain areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
United Kingdom 3 4%
Germany 2 3%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 68 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Professor 9 12%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Engineering 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,772,145
of 22,647,730 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,895
of 193,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,385
of 182,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#180
of 1,278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,647,730 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.