You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0014331 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel |
| Abstract |
This paper presents the first meta-analysis for the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of journal peer reviews. IRR is defined as the extent to which two or more independent reviews of the same scientific document agree. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 48% |
| Scientists | 19 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 5% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 138 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 13% |
| Professor | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 37 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 22% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#505,037
of 25,383,225 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,972
of 220,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,063
of 192,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#32
of 1,044 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,044 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.