You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Timing of Intervention Affects Brain Electrical Activity in Children Exposed to Severe Psychosocial Neglect
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011415 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ross E. Vanderwert, Peter J. Marshall, Charles A. Nelson, Charles H. Zeanah, Nathan A. Fox |
| Abstract |
Early psychosocial deprivation has profound effects on brain activity in the young child. Previous reports have shown increased power in slow frequencies of the electroencephalogram (EEG), primarily in the theta band, and decreased power in higher alpha and beta band frequencies in infants and children who have experienced institutional care. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 45 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 91 | 42% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 40 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2021.
All research outputs
#610,672
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#8,639
of 193,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,674
of 93,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#33
of 719 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 719 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.