↓ Skip to main content

From the Eye of the Albatrosses: A Bird-Borne Camera Shows an Association between Albatrosses and a Killer Whale in the Southern Ocean

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From the Eye of the Albatrosses: A Bird-Borne Camera Shows an Association between Albatrosses and a Killer Whale in the Southern Ocean
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kentaro Q. Sakamoto, Akinori Takahashi, Takashi Iwata, Philip N. Trathan

Abstract

Albatrosses fly many hundreds of kilometers across the open ocean to find and feed upon their prey. Despite the growing number of studies concerning their foraging behaviour, relatively little is known about how albatrosses actually locate their prey. Here, we present our results from the first deployments of a combined animal-borne camera and depth data logger on free-ranging black-browed albatrosses (Thalassarche melanophrys). The still images recorded from these cameras showed that some albatrosses actively followed a killer whale (Orcinus orca), possibly to feed on food scraps left by this diving predator. The camera images together with the depth profiles showed that the birds dived only occasionally, but that they actively dived when other birds or the killer whale were present. This association with diving predators or other birds may partially explain how albatrosses find their prey more efficiently in the apparently 'featureless' ocean, with a minimal requirement for energetically costly diving or landing activities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Portugal 3 1%
Chile 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 196 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 64 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 22%
Student > Master 30 14%
Other 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 16 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 167 75%
Environmental Science 21 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Psychology 3 1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 17 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#957,770
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,719
of 207,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,451
of 97,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#39
of 537 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 537 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.