You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pyocyanin-Enhanced Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Formation Requires the NADPH Oxidase
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0054205 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Balázs Rada, Meghan A. Jendrysik, Lan Pang, Craig P. Hayes, Dae-goon Yoo, Jonathan J. Park, Samuel M. Moskowitz, Harry L. Malech, Thomas L. Leto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 82 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 21% |
| Researcher | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 33% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#13,047,522
of 22,988,380 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#102,361
of 195,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,236
of 285,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,389
of 5,003 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,988,380 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,003 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.