↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
30 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003007.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teddy Oosterhuis, Leonardo OP Costa, Christopher G Maher, Henrica CW de Vet, Maurits W van Tulder, Raymond WJG Ostelo

Abstract

Several rehabilitation programmes are available for individuals after lumbar disc surgery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 12%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Researcher 25 10%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 46 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 16%
Psychology 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 58 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#854,647
of 14,418,392 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,581
of 10,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,559
of 222,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,418,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.