↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003007.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oosterhuis T, Costa LO, Maher CG, de Vet HC, van Tulder MW, Ostelo RW, Teddy Oosterhuis, Leonardo OP Costa, Christopher G Maher, Henrica CW de Vet, Maurits W van Tulder, Raymond WJG Ostelo, Oosterhuis, Teddy, Costa, Leonardo OP, Maher, Christopher G, de Vet, Henrica CW, van Tulder, Maurits W, Ostelo, Raymond WJG

Abstract

Several rehabilitation programmes are available for individuals after lumbar disc surgery.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 261 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 19%
Student > Bachelor 46 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 12%
Unspecified 30 11%
Researcher 26 10%
Other 86 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 52%
Unspecified 43 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 12%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 33 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2017.
All research outputs
#985,913
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,142
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,467
of 214,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.