↓ Skip to main content

Measuring determinants of implementation behavior: psychometric properties of a questionnaire based on the theoretical domains framework

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measuring determinants of implementation behavior: psychometric properties of a questionnaire based on the theoretical domains framework
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-9-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Johanna M Huijg, Winifred A Gebhardt, Elise Dusseldorp, Marieke W Verheijden, Nicolette van der Zouwe, Barend JC Middelkoop, Mathilde R Crone

Abstract

To be able to design effective strategies to improve healthcare professionals' implementation behaviors, a valid and reliable questionnaire is needed to assess potential implementation determinants. The present study describes the development of the Determinants of Implementation Behavior Questionnaire (DIBQ) and investigates the reliability and validity of this Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)-based questionnaire.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 353 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 18%
Student > Master 59 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 77 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 15%
Psychology 44 12%
Social Sciences 23 6%
Sports and Recreations 10 3%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 106 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,655,962
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#719
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,995
of 237,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#12
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.