You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metavir 2: new tools for viral metagenome comparison and assembled virome analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-15-76 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Roux, Jeremy Tournayre, Antoine Mahul, Didier Debroas, François Enault |
| Abstract |
Metagenomics, based on culture-independent sequencing, is a well-fitted approach to provide insights into the composition, structure and dynamics of environmental viral communities. Following recent advances in sequencing technologies, new challenges arise for existing bioinformatic tools dedicated to viral metagenome (i.e. virome) analysis as (i) the number of viromes is rapidly growing and (ii) large genomic fragments can now be obtained by assembling the huge amount of sequence data generated for each metagenome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Sweden | 1 | 13% |
| Norway | 1 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 448 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 6 | 1% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 419 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 107 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 105 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 62 | 14% |
| Unknown | 56 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 182 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 81 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 30 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 9% |
| Unknown | 73 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,548,945
of 25,116,143 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#243
of 7,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,159
of 229,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#7
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,116,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.