↓ Skip to main content

How plants cope with heavy metals

Overview of attention for article published in Botanical Studies, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 101)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How plants cope with heavy metals
Published in
Botanical Studies, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1999-3110-55-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrin Viehweger

Abstract

Heavy metals are naturally occurring in the earth's crust but anthropogenic and industrial activities have led to drastic environmental pollutions in distinct areas. Plants are able to colonize such sites due to several mechanisms of heavy metal tolerance. Understanding of these pathways enables different fruitful approaches like phytoremediation and biofortification.Therefore, this review addresses mechanisms of heavy metal tolerance and toxicity in plants possessing a sophisticated network for maintenance of metal homeostasis. Key elements of this are chelation and sequestration which result either in removal of toxic metal from sensitive sites or conduct essential metal to their specific cellular destination. This implies shared pathways which can result in toxic symptoms especially in an excess of metal. These overlaps go on with signal transduction pathways induced by heavy metals which include common elements of other signal cascades. Nevertheless, there are specific reactions some of them will be discussed with special focus on the cellular level.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 310 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 83 26%
Student > Master 59 18%
Researcher 49 15%
Student > Bachelor 32 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 34 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 140 43%
Environmental Science 59 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 10%
Chemistry 16 5%
Engineering 9 3%
Other 19 6%
Unknown 48 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2014.
All research outputs
#3,550,046
of 12,440,396 outputs
Outputs from Botanical Studies
#21
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,770
of 191,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Botanical Studies
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,440,396 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them