↓ Skip to main content

Effects of campaign for postpartum vaccination on seronegative rate against rubella among Japanese women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of campaign for postpartum vaccination on seronegative rate against rubella among Japanese women
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takahiro Yamada, Junko Mochizuki, Masachi Hanaoka, Eriko Hashimoto, Akihide Ohkuchi, Mika Ito, Takahiko Kubo, Akihito Nakai, Shigeru Saito, Nobuya Unno, Shigeki Matsubara, Hisanori Minakami

Abstract

Japan experienced two rubella outbreaks in the past decade (2004 and 2012-2013), resulting in 10 and 20 infants with congenital rubella syndrome (CRS), respectively. This study was performed to determine whether the seronegative rate was lower in multiparous women than in primiparous women in Japan.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 32%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Unspecified 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 4 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,093,603
of 23,866,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3,484
of 7,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,561
of 225,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#70
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,866,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.