↓ Skip to main content

Pathway Analysis for Genome-Wide Association Study of Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pathway Analysis for Genome-Wide Association Study of Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0022760
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mingfeng Zhang, Liming Liang, Mousheng Xu, Abrar A. Qureshi, Jiali Han

Abstract

Recently, a pathway-based approach has been developed to evaluate the cumulative contribution of the functionally related genes for genome-wide association studies (GWASs), which may help utilize GWAS data to a greater extent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
India 1 4%
Australia 1 4%
Unknown 25 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Computer Science 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2011.
All research outputs
#18,293,967
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,633
of 193,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,090
of 119,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,783
of 2,280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.