You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Coeliac Patients Are Undiagnosed at Routine Upper Endoscopy
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0090552 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kathryn Robson, Michelle Alizart, Jarad Martin, Robyn Nagel |
Abstract |
Two out of three patients with Coeliac Disease (CD) in Australia are undiagnosed. This prospective clinical audit aimed to determine how many CD patients would be undiagnosed if duodenal biopsy had only been performed if the mucosa looked abnormal or the patient presented with typical CD symptoms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 44% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Mexico | 1 | 11% |
Romania | 1 | 11% |
Belgium | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 23% |
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 35% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
Psychology | 3 | 10% |
Linguistics | 2 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2014.
All research outputs
#4,546,665
of 22,749,166 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#62,339
of 194,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,571
of 221,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,616
of 6,078 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,749,166 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,169 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,078 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.