↓ Skip to main content

Variation in the human cannabinoid receptor CNR1 gene modulates gaze duration for happy faces

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Autism, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

2 blogs
4 X users
4 Facebook pages
1 Redditor


48 Dimensions

Readers on

130 Mendeley
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Variation in the human cannabinoid receptor CNR1 gene modulates gaze duration for happy faces
Published in
Molecular Autism, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/2040-2392-2-10
Pubmed ID

Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Simon Baron-Cohen


From an early age, humans look longer at preferred stimuli and also typically look longer at facial expressions of emotion, particularly happy faces. Atypical gaze patterns towards social stimuli are common in autism spectrum conditions (ASC). However, it is unknown whether gaze fixation patterns have any genetic basis. In this study, we tested whether variations in the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CNR1) gene are associated with gaze duration towards happy faces. This gene was selected because CNR1 is a key component of the endocannabinoid system, which is involved in processing reward, and in our previous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we found that variations in CNR1 modulate the striatal response to happy (but not disgust) faces. The striatum is involved in guiding gaze to rewarding aspects of a visual scene. We aimed to validate and extend this result in another sample using a different technique (gaze tracking).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 120 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Neuroscience 12 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Autism
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 122,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Autism
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.