You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Global Conservation Significance of Ecuador's Yasuní National Park
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0008767 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margot S. Bass, Matt Finer, Clinton N. Jenkins, Holger Kreft, Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia, Shawn F. McCracken, Nigel C. A. Pitman, Peter H. English, Kelly Swing, Gorky Villa, Anthony Di Fiore, Christian C. Voigt, Thomas H. Kunz |
Abstract |
The threats facing Ecuador's Yasuní National Park are emblematic of those confronting the greater western Amazon, one of the world's last high-biodiversity wilderness areas. Notably, the country's second largest untapped oil reserves--called "ITT"--lie beneath an intact, remote section of the park. The conservation significance of Yasuní may weigh heavily in upcoming state-level and international decisions, including whether to develop the oil or invest in alternatives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ecuador | 28 | 41% |
United States | 5 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 1% |
Comoros | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Thailand | 1 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 53 | 78% |
Scientists | 10 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 804 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 1% |
Spain | 6 | <1% |
Ecuador | 6 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
Brazil | 4 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Senegal | 1 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 1% |
Unknown | 756 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 142 | 18% |
Student > Master | 134 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 124 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 94 | 12% |
Professor | 37 | 5% |
Other | 121 | 15% |
Unknown | 152 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 293 | 36% |
Environmental Science | 167 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 42 | 5% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 29 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 3% |
Other | 84 | 10% |
Unknown | 164 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#237,151
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,447
of 225,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#779
of 174,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#9
of 634 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 634 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.