↓ Skip to main content

Global Conservation Significance of Ecuador's Yasuní National Park

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
68 X users
facebook
17 Facebook pages
wikipedia
23 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
338 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
804 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global Conservation Significance of Ecuador's Yasuní National Park
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008767
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margot S. Bass, Matt Finer, Clinton N. Jenkins, Holger Kreft, Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia, Shawn F. McCracken, Nigel C. A. Pitman, Peter H. English, Kelly Swing, Gorky Villa, Anthony Di Fiore, Christian C. Voigt, Thomas H. Kunz

Abstract

The threats facing Ecuador's Yasuní National Park are emblematic of those confronting the greater western Amazon, one of the world's last high-biodiversity wilderness areas. Notably, the country's second largest untapped oil reserves--called "ITT"--lie beneath an intact, remote section of the park. The conservation significance of Yasuní may weigh heavily in upcoming state-level and international decisions, including whether to develop the oil or invest in alternatives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 804 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 1%
Spain 6 <1%
Ecuador 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Other 10 1%
Unknown 756 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 142 18%
Student > Master 134 17%
Student > Bachelor 124 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 94 12%
Professor 37 5%
Other 121 15%
Unknown 152 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 293 36%
Environmental Science 167 21%
Social Sciences 42 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 3%
Other 84 10%
Unknown 164 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#237,151
of 25,891,484 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,447
of 225,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#779
of 174,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#9
of 634 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,891,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 634 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.