You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Billie Bonevski, Madeleine Randell, Chris Paul, Kathy Chapman, Laura Twyman, Jamie Bryant, Irena Brozek, Clare Hughes |
| Abstract |
This study aims to review the literature regarding the barriers to sampling, recruitment, participation, and retention of members of socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in health research and strategies for increasing the amount of health research conducted with socially disadvantaged groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 43% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 46% |
| Scientists | 12 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 983 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 971 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 180 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 140 | 14% |
| Researcher | 136 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 75 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 56 | 6% |
| Other | 150 | 15% |
| Unknown | 246 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 187 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 127 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 114 | 12% |
| Psychology | 109 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 130 | 13% |
| Unknown | 297 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#983,374
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#92
of 2,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,329
of 238,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.