↓ Skip to main content

Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008486.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sue Woodward, Christine Norton, Pauline Chiarelli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 352 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 20%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 9%
Student > Postgraduate 28 8%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 78 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 14%
Psychology 21 6%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 91 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2022.
All research outputs
#5,623,667
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,473
of 12,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,214
of 225,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 230 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 230 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.