↓ Skip to main content

First Long-Term Behavioral Records from Cuvier’s Beaked Whales (Ziphius cavirostris) Reveal Record-Breaking Dives

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
12 blogs
twitter
89 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
31 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
433 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First Long-Term Behavioral Records from Cuvier’s Beaked Whales (Ziphius cavirostris) Reveal Record-Breaking Dives
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0092633
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory S. Schorr, Erin A. Falcone, David J. Moretti, Russel D. Andrews

Abstract

Cuvier's beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris) are known as extreme divers, though behavioral data from this difficult-to-study species have been limited. They are also the species most often stranded in association with Mid-Frequency Active (MFA) sonar use, a relationship that remains poorly understood. We used satellite-linked tags to record the diving behavior and locations of eight Ziphius off the Southern California coast for periods up to three months. The effort resulted in 3732 hr of dive data with associated regional movements--the first dataset of its kind for any beaked whale--and included dives to 2992 m depth and lasting 137.5 min, both new mammalian dive records. Deep dives had a group mean depth of 1401 m (s.d. = 137.8, n = 1142) and duration of 67.4 min (s.d. = 6.9). The group mean time between deep dives was 102.3 min (s.d. = 30.8, n = 783). While the previously described stereotypic pattern of deep and shallow dives was apparent, there was considerable inter- and intra-individual variability in most parameters. There was significant diel behavioral variation, including increased time near the surface and decreased shallow diving at night. However, maximum depth and the proportion of time spent on deep dives (presumed foraging), varied little from day to night. Surprisingly, tagged whales were present within an MFA sonar training range for 38% of days locations were received, and though comprehensive records of sonar use during tag deployments were not available, we discuss the effects frequent acoustic disturbance may have had on the observed behaviors. These data better characterize the true behavioral range of this species, and suggest caution should be exercised when drawing conclusions about behavior using short-term datasets.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 433 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 417 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 87 20%
Student > Bachelor 84 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 12%
Student > Master 53 12%
Other 30 7%
Other 54 12%
Unknown 72 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 201 46%
Environmental Science 75 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 3%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 78 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 487. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#55,647
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#947
of 225,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#369
of 239,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#27
of 5,387 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,387 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.