You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Intake of Fruit Juice and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0093471 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bo Xi, Shuangshuang Li, Zhaolu Liu, Huan Tian, Xiuxiu Yin, Pengcheng Huai, Weihong Tang, Donghao Zhou, Lyn M. Steffen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 18% |
India | 2 | 6% |
Canada | 2 | 6% |
Colombia | 2 | 6% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 3% |
Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 17 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 18% |
Scientists | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 243 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 37 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 10% |
Researcher | 20 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 7% |
Other | 42 | 17% |
Unknown | 67 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 22% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
Other | 36 | 15% |
Unknown | 81 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 177. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2023.
All research outputs
#232,893
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,389
of 224,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,841
of 239,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#84
of 5,393 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,393 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.