↓ Skip to main content

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for treatment of respiratory failure due to exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
282 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for treatment of respiratory failure due to exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004104.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ram FS, Picot J, Lightowler J, Wedzicha JA, Ram, Felix SF, Picot, Joanna, Lightowler, Josephine, Wedzicha, Jadwiga A

Abstract

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is being used increasingly in the management of patients admitted to hospital with acute respiratory failure secondary to an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 230 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 42 17%
Student > Master 41 17%
Student > Postgraduate 35 14%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Other 78 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 188 76%
Unspecified 20 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 11 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2016.
All research outputs
#727,550
of 7,059,888 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,918
of 8,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,357
of 171,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,059,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.