↓ Skip to main content

Influence of Morphine and Naloxone on Pain Modulation in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Fibromyalgia, and Controls: A Double‐Blind, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, Cross‐Over Study

Overview of attention for article published in Pain Practice, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of Morphine and Naloxone on Pain Modulation in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Fibromyalgia, and Controls: A Double‐Blind, Randomized, Placebo‐Controlled, Cross‐Over Study
Published in
Pain Practice, November 2017
DOI 10.1111/papr.12613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Hermans, Jo Nijs, Patrick Calders, Luc De Clerck, Greta Moorkens, Guy Hans, Sofie Grosemans, Tine Roman De Mettelinge, Joanna Tuynman, Mira Meeus

Abstract

Impaired pain inhibitory and enhanced pain facilitatory mechanisms are repeatedly reported in patients with central sensitization pain. However, the exact effects of frequently prescribed opioids on central pain modulation are still unknown. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial was carried out. Ten CFS/FM patients, 11 RA patients and 20 controls were randomly allocated to the experimental (10 mg morphine or 0.2 mg/ml Naloxone) and placebo (2 ml Aqua) group. Pressure Pain Thresholds (PPTs) and temporal summation at the Trapezius and Quadriceps were assessed by algometry. Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) efficacy and Deep Tissue Pain pressure were assessed by adding ischemic occlusion at the opposite upper arm. Deep Tissue Pain pressure was lower and temporal summation higher in CFS/FM (p=0.002 respectively p=0.010) and RA patients (p=0.011 respectively p=0.047) compared to controls at baseline. Morphine had only a positive effect on PPTs in both patient groups (p time =0.034). Accordingly, PPTs increased after placebo, and no effects on the other pain parameters were objectified. There were no significant effects of naloxone nor nocebo on PPT, Deep Tissue Pain, temporal summation or CPM in the control group. This study revealed anti-hyperalgesia effects of morphine in CFS/FM and RA patients. Nevertheless, these effects were comparable to placebo. Besides, neither morphine nor naloxone influenced Deep Tissue Pain, temporal summation or CPM. Therefore, these results suggest that the opioid system is not dominant in (enhanced) bottom-up sensitization (temporal summation) or (impaired) endogenous pain inhibition (CPM) in patients with CFS/FM or RA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Researcher 11 7%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 15%
Psychology 10 6%
Neuroscience 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 52 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2017.
All research outputs
#1,470,320
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Pain Practice
#67
of 944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,517
of 330,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain Practice
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.