↓ Skip to main content

Development of HuMiChip for Functional Profiling of Human Microbiomes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of HuMiChip for Functional Profiling of Human Microbiomes
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0090546
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qichao Tu, Zhili He, Yan Li, Yanfei Chen, Ye Deng, Lu Lin, Christopher L. Hemme, Tong Yuan, Joy D. Van Nostrand, Liyou Wu, Xuedong Zhou, Wenyuan Shi, Lanjuan Li, Jian Xu, Jizhong Zhou

Abstract

Understanding the diversity, composition, structure, function, and dynamics of human microbiomes in individual human hosts is crucial to reveal human-microbial interactions, especially for patients with microbially mediated disorders, but challenging due to the high diversity of the human microbiome. Here we have developed a functional gene-based microarray for profiling human microbiomes (HuMiChip) with 36,802 probes targeting 50,007 protein coding sequences for 139 key functional gene families. Computational evaluation suggested all probes included are highly specific to their target sequences. HuMiChip was used to analyze human oral and gut microbiomes, showing significantly different functional gene profiles between oral and gut microbiome. Obvious shifts of microbial functional structure and composition were observed for both patients with dental caries and periodontitis from moderate to advanced stages, suggesting a progressive change of microbial communities in response to the diseases. Consistent gene family profiles were observed by both HuMiChip and next generation sequencing technologies. Additionally, HuMiChip was able to detect gene families at as low as 0.001% relative abundance. The results indicate that the developed HuMiChip is a useful and effective tool for functional profiling of human microbiomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2014.
All research outputs
#14,680,831
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#122,921
of 201,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,904
of 222,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,461
of 6,092 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,092 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.