↓ Skip to main content

The evolutionary neuroscience of musical beat perception: the Action Simulation for Auditory Prediction (ASAP) hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 1,410)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
41 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
512 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The evolutionary neuroscience of musical beat perception: the Action Simulation for Auditory Prediction (ASAP) hypothesis
Published in
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aniruddh D. Patel, John R. Iversen

Abstract

a perceived periodic pulse that structures the perception of musical rhythm and which serves as a framework for synchronized movement to music. What are the neural mechanisms of musical beat perception, and how did they evolve? One view, which dates back to Darwin and implicitly informs some current models of beat perception, is that the relevant neural mechanisms are relatively general and are widespread among animal species. On the basis of recent neural and cross-species data on musical beat processing, this paper argues for a different view. Here we argue that beat perception is a complex brain function involving temporally-precise communication between auditory regions and motor planning regions of the cortex (even in the absence of overt movement). More specifically, we propose that simulation of periodic movement in motor planning regions provides a neural signal that helps the auditory system predict the timing of upcoming beats. This "action simulation for auditory prediction" (ASAP) hypothesis leads to testable predictions. We further suggest that ASAP relies on dorsal auditory pathway connections between auditory regions and motor planning regions via the parietal cortex, and suggest that these connections may be stronger in humans than in non-human primates due to the evolution of vocal learning in our lineage. This suggestion motivates cross-species research to determine which species are capable of human-like beat perception, i.e., beat perception that involves accurate temporal prediction of beat times across a fairly broad range of tempi.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 512 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 500 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 123 24%
Student > Master 82 16%
Researcher 63 12%
Student > Bachelor 60 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 5%
Other 69 13%
Unknown 90 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 150 29%
Neuroscience 91 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 7%
Arts and Humanities 31 6%
Linguistics 17 3%
Other 78 15%
Unknown 111 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#679,703
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#46
of 1,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,093
of 242,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
#6
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.