You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outcome of single immediate implants placed in post-extraction infected and non-infected sites, restored with cemented crowns: A 3-year prospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Dental Medicine, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vanessa Montoya-Salazar, Raquel Castillo-Oyagüe, Carlos Torres-Sánchez, Christopher D. Lynch, José-Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez, Daniel Torres-Lagares |
| Abstract |
To compare the survival of immediate implants placed in postextraction infected and non-infected sites, restored with cemented crowns. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 20% |
| Unknown | 63 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 133 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 70 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2014.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Dental Medicine
#814
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,231
of 226,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Dental Medicine
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.