↓ Skip to main content

Outcome of single immediate implants placed in post-extraction infected and non-infected sites, restored with cemented crowns: A 3-year prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Dental Medicine, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outcome of single immediate implants placed in post-extraction infected and non-infected sites, restored with cemented crowns: A 3-year prospective study
Published in
Journal of Dental Medicine, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.03.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Montoya-Salazar, Raquel Castillo-Oyagüe, Carlos Torres-Sánchez, Christopher D. Lynch, José-Luis Gutiérrez-Pérez, Daniel Torres-Lagares

Abstract

To compare the survival of immediate implants placed in postextraction infected and non-infected sites, restored with cemented crowns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 232 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 20%
Student > Postgraduate 23 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Researcher 12 5%
Other 53 23%
Unknown 64 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 134 58%
Unspecified 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 71 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2014.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Dental Medicine
#814
of 1,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,231
of 226,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Dental Medicine
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,057 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.