↓ Skip to main content

Alignment-free Visualization of Metagenomic Data by Nonlinear Dimension Reduction

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alignment-free Visualization of Metagenomic Data by Nonlinear Dimension Reduction
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep04516
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cedric C. Laczny, Nicolás Pinel, Nikos Vlassis, Paul Wilmes

Abstract

The visualization of metagenomic data, especially without prior taxonomic identification of reconstructed genomic fragments, is a challenging problem in computational biology. An ideal visualization method should, among others, enable clear distinction of congruent groups of sequences of closely related taxa, be applicable to fragments of lengths typically achievable following assembly, and allow the efficient analysis of the growing amounts of community genomic sequence data. Here, we report a scalable approach for the visualization of metagenomic data that is based on nonlinear dimension reduction via Barnes-Hut Stochastic Neighbor Embedding of centered log-ratio transformed oligonucleotide signatures extracted from assembled genomic sequence fragments. The approach allows for alignment-free assessment of the data-inherent taxonomic structure, and it can potentially facilitate the downstream binning of genomic fragments into uniform clusters reflecting organismal origin. We demonstrate the performance of our approach by visualizing community genomic sequence data from simulated as well as groundwater, human-derived and marine microbial communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 5%
Germany 4 2%
South Africa 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 204 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 28%
Researcher 47 20%
Student > Master 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 26 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 16%
Computer Science 24 10%
Environmental Science 14 6%
Mathematics 6 3%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 28 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,893,881
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#17,304
of 126,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,071
of 227,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#89
of 727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.