↓ Skip to main content

3-D Modelling of Megaloolithid Clutches: Insights about Nest Construction and Dinosaur Behaviour

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
3-D Modelling of Megaloolithid Clutches: Insights about Nest Construction and Dinosaur Behaviour
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010362
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernat Vila, Frankie D. Jackson, Josep Fortuny, Albert G. Sellés, Àngel Galobart

Abstract

Megaloolithid eggs have long been associated with sauropod dinosaurs. Despite their extensive and worldwide fossil record, interpretations of egg size and shape, clutch morphology, and incubation strategy vary. The Pinyes locality in the Upper Cretaceous Tremp Formation in the southern Pyrenees, Catalonia provides new information for addressing these issues. Nine horizons containing Megaloolithus siruguei clutches are exposed near the village of Coll de Nargó. Tectonic deformation in the study area strongly influenced egg size and shape, which could potentially lead to misinterpretation of reproductive biology if 2D and 3D maps are not corrected for bed dip that results from tectonism.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 67 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Other 9 13%
Student > Master 9 13%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 27 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 32%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Engineering 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,021,540
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,071
of 225,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,982
of 105,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#52
of 723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.