↓ Skip to main content

Randomized controlled trial to assess the short‐term effectiveness of tailored web‐ and text‐based facilitation of smoking cessation in primary care (i Q uit in P ractice)

Overview of attention for article published in Addiction, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized controlled trial to assess the short‐term effectiveness of tailored web‐ and text‐based facilitation of smoking cessation in primary care (i Q uit in P ractice)
Published in
Addiction, April 2014
DOI 10.1111/add.12556
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felix Naughton, James Jamison, Sue Boase, Melanie Sloan, Hazel Gilbert, A. Toby Prevost, Dan Mason, Susan Smith, James Brimicombe, Robert Evans, Stephen Sutton

Abstract

To estimate the short-term effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of a smoking cessation intervention (the iQuit system) that consists of tailored printed and Short Message Service (SMS) text message self-help delivered as an adjunct to cessation support in primary care to inform the design of a definitive trial.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 177 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 17%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Master 24 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 8%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 27%
Psychology 28 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 13%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Computer Science 8 4%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 43 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,760,094
of 18,999,792 outputs
Outputs from Addiction
#3,073
of 5,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,487
of 202,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Addiction
#40
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,999,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.