↓ Skip to main content

Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
44 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
281 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005620.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Graciela Rasines Alcaraz, Analia Veitz-Keenan, Philipp Sahrmann, Patrick Roger Schmidlin, Dell Davis, Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 281 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 276 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 18%
Student > Bachelor 46 16%
Student > Postgraduate 29 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Researcher 22 8%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Materials Science 4 1%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 61 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#296,910
of 14,331,597 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#752
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,521
of 192,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,331,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.