↓ Skip to main content

Microlens arrays in the complex visual system of Cretaceous echinoderms

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Microlens arrays in the complex visual system of Cretaceous echinoderms
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms4576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Przemysław Gorzelak, Mariusz A. Salamon, Rafał Lach, Michał Loba, Bruno Ferré

Abstract

It has long been assumed that photosensitivity in echinoderms is mainly related to diffuse photoreception mediated by photosensitive regions embedded within the dermis. Recent studies, however, have shown that some extant echinoderms may also display modified ossicles with microlenses acting as sophisticated photosensory organs. Thanks to their remarkable properties, these calcitic microlenses serve as an inspiration for scientists across various disciplines among which bio-inspired engineering. However, the evolutionary origins of these microlenses remain obscure. Here we provide microstructural evidence showing that analogous spherical calcitic lenses had been acquired in some brittle stars and starfish of Poland by the Late Cretaceous (Campanian, ~79 Ma). Specimens from Poland described here had a highly developed visual system similar to that of modern forms. We suggest that such an optimization of echinoderm skeletons for both mechanical and optical purposes reflects escalation-related adaptation to increased predation pressure during the so-called Mesozoic Marine Revolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Sweden 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 21 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 13%
Chemistry 2 8%
Materials Science 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,638,600
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#26,744
of 46,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,917
of 226,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#230
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,111 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.