↓ Skip to main content

Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
993 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1385 Mendeley
citeulike
35 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Viruses in the faecal microbiota of monozygotic twins and their mothers
Published in
Nature, July 2010
DOI 10.1038/nature09199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alejandro Reyes, Matthew Haynes, Nicole Hanson, Florent E. Angly, Andrew C. Heath, Forest Rohwer, Jeffrey I. Gordon

Abstract

Viral diversity and life cycles are poorly understood in the human gut and other body habitats. Phages and their encoded functions may provide informative signatures of a human microbiota and of microbial community responses to various disturbances, and may indicate whether community health or dysfunction is manifest after apparent recovery from a disease or therapeutic intervention. Here we report sequencing of the viromes (metagenomes) of virus-like particles isolated from faecal samples collected from healthy adult female monozygotic twins and their mothers at three time points over a one-year period. We compared these data sets with data sets of sequenced bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA genes and total-faecal-community DNA. Co-twins and their mothers share a significantly greater degree of similarity in their faecal bacterial communities than do unrelated individuals. In contrast, viromes are unique to individuals regardless of their degree of genetic relatedness. Despite remarkable interpersonal variations in viromes and their encoded functions, intrapersonal diversity is very low, with >95% of virotypes retained over the period surveyed, and with viromes dominated by a few temperate phages that exhibit remarkable genetic stability. These results indicate that a predatory viral-microbial dynamic, manifest in a number of other characterized environmental ecosystems, is notably absent in the very distal intestine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 41 3%
Spain 7 <1%
Brazil 7 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Denmark 3 <1%
Other 27 2%
Unknown 1280 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 328 24%
Researcher 290 21%
Student > Master 162 12%
Student > Bachelor 138 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 62 4%
Other 238 17%
Unknown 167 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 570 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 207 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 142 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 109 8%
Environmental Science 24 2%
Other 125 9%
Unknown 208 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#431,322
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#20,726
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,076
of 108,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#30
of 580 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 580 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.