↓ Skip to main content

McArdle disease: a “pediatric” disorder presenting in an adult with acute kidney injury

Overview of attention for article published in CEN Case Reports, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
McArdle disease: a “pediatric” disorder presenting in an adult with acute kidney injury
Published in
CEN Case Reports, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13730-017-0265-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xixi Zhao, Angela Li, Madhu Soni, Michael J. Muriello, Carolyn H. Jones, William L. Whittier

Abstract

Rhabdomyolysis is characterized by the acute breakdown of skeletal muscle, resulting in the release of muscle cell contents, subsequent myoglobinuria, and in severe cases, acute renal failure. A number of etiologies have been identified in acute rhabdomyolysis, in which drugs and trauma account for the majority of cases. One etiological category that is commonly overlooked in the adult population is an underlying genetic defect. This may be challenging to diagnose due to its rarity in the adult demographic and the marked heterogeneity, often requiring a high level of clinical suspicion before investigation is pursued. Once diagnosed, however, appropriate steps can be taken to reduce future episodes of rhabdomyolysis, further renal injury, and other systemic complications. Here, we report a case of an adult patient presenting with acute rhabdomyolysis secondary to McArdle disease, a genetic disease causing defective glycogenolysis. The case highlights the importance of recognizing the potential of undiagnosed "pediatric" disorders in adulthood and particularly for underlying genetic causes of rhabdomyolysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Professor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 2 20%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 20%
Engineering 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2023.
All research outputs
#8,477,781
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from CEN Case Reports
#54
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,660
of 328,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CEN Case Reports
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.