↓ Skip to main content

VALIDADE CONCORRENTE DA ESCALA BRUNET-LÉZINE COM A ESCALA BAYLEY PARA AVALIAÇÃO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO DE BEBÊS PRÉ-TERMO ATÉ DOIS ANOS

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Paulista de Pediatria, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
VALIDADE CONCORRENTE DA ESCALA BRUNET-LÉZINE COM A ESCALA BAYLEY PARA AVALIAÇÃO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO DE BEBÊS PRÉ-TERMO ATÉ DOIS ANOS
Published in
Revista Paulista de Pediatria, January 2017
DOI 10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;2;00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernanda Guimarães Campos Cardoso, Cibelle Kayenne Martins Roberto Formiga, Thailyne Bizinotto, Rogério Blasbalg Tessler, Francisco Rosa

Abstract

To verify the correlation between the areas evaluated by the Brunet-Lézine and the Bayley III scales of preterm infants up to two years. The study included 88 children who were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (1 month to 5 months and 29 days of corrected chronological ages - CCA) with 32 children; Group 2 (6 months to 11 months and 29 days of CCA) with 36 participants; and Group 3 (18 -23 months and 23 days of CCA) with 20 children. The concurrent validity of the Brunet-Lézine scale and the Bayley III scale was calculated using the Pearson correlation or its non-parametric version, the Spearman correlation. Group 1 showed moderate correlation between the developmental quotient for hand-eye and fine motor coordination (DQE), and fine motor score (ρ=0.448; p=0.01). Group 2 had moderate correlation between the developmental quotient for posture and gross motor function (DQP), and the gross motor score (ρ=0.484; p=0.003, between the DQE and fine motor score (r=0.489; p=0.002), and between the developmental quotient for social reactions (DQS) and the socio emotional score (r=0.435; p=0.008). Group 3 showed moderate correlation between the DQP and the gross motor score (ρ=0.468; p=0.037) and strong correlation between developmental quotient for language (DQL) and the score of language (r=0.890; p<0.001). The Brunet-Lézine scale showed strong correlation with the Bayley III scale regarding the language domain in Group 3, suggesting its validity to assess the language of children aged between 18 and 24 months.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 12 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Psychology 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 15 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#347
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362,560
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Paulista de Pediatria
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.