↓ Skip to main content

MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, August 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
patent
27 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
7321 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3542 Mendeley
citeulike
47 CiteULike
connotea
9 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, August 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-5-113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert C Edgar

Abstract

In a previous paper, we introduced MUSCLE, a new program for creating multiple alignments of protein sequences, giving a brief summary of the algorithm and showing MUSCLE to achieve the highest scores reported to date on four alignment accuracy benchmarks. Here we present a more complete discussion of the algorithm, describing several previously unpublished techniques that improve biological accuracy and / or computational complexity. We introduce a new option, MUSCLE-fast, designed for high-throughput applications. We also describe a new protocol for evaluating objective functions that align two profiles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,542 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 68 2%
Brazil 24 <1%
Germany 19 <1%
United Kingdom 18 <1%
France 13 <1%
Netherlands 9 <1%
Spain 9 <1%
Mexico 9 <1%
Canada 7 <1%
Other 58 2%
Unknown 3308 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 774 22%
Researcher 603 17%
Student > Master 464 13%
Student > Bachelor 378 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 164 5%
Other 515 15%
Unknown 644 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1479 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 706 20%
Computer Science 142 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 97 3%
Environmental Science 91 3%
Other 292 8%
Unknown 735 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,581,581
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#234
of 7,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,776
of 66,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.