You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Getting Started in Gene Orthology and Functional Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000703 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gang Fang, Nitin Bhardwaj, Rebecca Robilotto, Mark B. Gerstein |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 528 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 2% |
| Brazil | 10 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 4% |
| Unknown | 452 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 144 | 27% |
| Researcher | 107 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 78 | 15% |
| Unknown | 68 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 268 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 101 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 27 | 5% |
| Engineering | 11 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 40 | 8% |
| Unknown | 75 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2019.
All research outputs
#6,374,015
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,353
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,044
of 103,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#24
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.