↓ Skip to main content

Paroxetine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Paroxetine versus other anti-depressive agents for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006531.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marianna Purgato, Davide Papola, Chiara Gastaldon, Carlotta Trespidi, Laura R Magni, Carla Rizzo, Toshi A Furukawa, Norio Watanabe, Andrea Cipriani, Corrado Barbui

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 244 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 22%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 12%
Researcher 29 12%
Unspecified 25 10%
Other 75 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 44%
Unspecified 32 13%
Psychology 25 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 7%
Other 47 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2019.
All research outputs
#391,140
of 12,937,409 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,214
of 10,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,054
of 190,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#38
of 211 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,937,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 211 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.