↓ Skip to main content

Adaptação cultural e propriedades psicométricas iniciais do instrumento DISABKIDS ® – Cystic Fibrosis Module – versão brasileira

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Adaptação cultural e propriedades psicométricas iniciais do instrumento DISABKIDS ® – Cystic Fibrosis Module – versão brasileira
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, December 2013
DOI 10.1590/s0080-623420130000600009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Danielle Maria de Souza Serio dos Santos, Keila Cristiane Deon, Claudia Fegadolli, Roberta Alvarenga Reis, Lidia Alice Gomes Monteiro Marin Torres, Monika Bullinger, Claudia Benedita dos Santos

Abstract

This study aimed to perform the cultural adaptation and describe the initial psychometric properties of the DISABKIDS®-Cystic Fibrosis Module instrument to measure health-related quality of life for children and adolescents and their parents/caregivers. Methodological study of sequential development, including 126 participants in four Brazilian states. Involved translation and back translation of items, semantic and conceptual equivalence, face validity and description of the initial psychometric properties related to the construct and reliability. For semantic equivalence of the adapted version, there were adjustments in the phrasing of an item. The instrument showed satisfactory internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha values between 0.70 and 0.85, convergent validity with correlation values above 0.40 in 85% of the items and divergent validity with scale fit higher than 75%. The Brazilian version of DISABKIDS® - CFM will certainly constitute a valid and reliable instrument for measuring the quality of life of Brazilian children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 35%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Unspecified 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#661
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,779
of 320,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.