You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2318-14-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene Drubbel, Mattijs E Numans, Guido Kranenburg, Nienke Bleijenberg, Niek J de Wit, Marieke J Schuurmans |
| Abstract |
To better accommodate for the complex care needs of frail, older people, general practitioners must be capable of easily identifying frailty in daily clinical practice, for example, by using the frailty index (FI). To explore whether the FI is a valid and adequate screening instrument for primary care, we conducted a systematic review of its psychometric properties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 45 | 19% |
| Researcher | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 23% |
| Unknown | 36 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 5% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 54 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2014.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#2,618
of 3,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,973
of 221,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#33
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.