↓ Skip to main content

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings in Schistosomiasis mansoni: expanded gallbladder fossa and fatty hilum signs

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging findings in Schistosomiasis mansoni: expanded gallbladder fossa and fatty hilum signs
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, July 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0037-86822012005000008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Cristina dos Santos Silva, Luciene Mota Andrade, Ivie Braga de Paula, Leonardo Campos de Queiroz, Carlos Maurício Figueiredo Antunes, José Roberto Lambertucci

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,535,755
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#91
of 591 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,009
of 165,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 591 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.