You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Measuring Cytotoxicity by Bioluminescence Imaging Outperforms the Standard Chromium-51 Release Assay
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0089357 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mobin A. Karimi, Eric Lee, Michael H. Bachmann, Ana Maria Salicioni, Edward M. Behrens, Taku Kambayashi, Cynthia L. Baldwin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 286 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 13% |
| Unknown | 78 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 60 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 44 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 8% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 81 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#105,188
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,265
of 242,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,110
of 5,805 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,805 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.