↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying Aggregated Uncertainty in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Prevalence and Populations at Risk via Efficient Space-Time Geostatistical Joint Simulation

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying Aggregated Uncertainty in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria Prevalence and Populations at Risk via Efficient Space-Time Geostatistical Joint Simulation
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000724
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter W. Gething, Anand P. Patil, Simon I. Hay

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Kenya 2 2%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 16%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Computer Science 6 6%
Environmental Science 6 6%
Other 24 25%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,621,995
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,666
of 9,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,481
of 103,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#34
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.