↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility and Nutritional Impact of Laparoscopy-assisted Subtotal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer in the Upper Stomach

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility and Nutritional Impact of Laparoscopy-assisted Subtotal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer in the Upper Stomach
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2014
DOI 10.1245/s10434-014-3520-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshiyuki Kosuga, Naoki Hiki, Souya Nunobe, Hisashi Noma, Michitaka Honda, Shinya Tanimura, Takeshi Sano, Toshiharu Yamaguchi

Abstract

Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) is commonly performed for early gastric cancer (EGC) in the upper stomach; however, the incidence of anastomotic complications remains high, and postoperative nutritional status is not satisfactory. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and nutritional impact of a novel surgical procedure, laparoscopy-assisted subtotal gastrectomy (LAsTG).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Other 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,369,403
of 22,751,628 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,968
of 6,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,930
of 224,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#54
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,751,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.