↓ Skip to main content

Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004260.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harvey LA, Brosseau L, Herbert RD, Harvey, Lisa A, Brosseau, Lucie, Herbert, Robert D

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty is a common intervention for patients with arthritis. Post-surgical rehabilitation often includes continuous passive motion. However, it is not clear whether continuous passive motion is effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 89 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 19%
Student > Master 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 28 29%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 11%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 12 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2014.
All research outputs
#3,014,523
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,484
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,657
of 199,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.