You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Consensus statement on the investigation and management of non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr‐axSpA)
|
---|---|
Published in |
APLAR Journal of Rheumatology, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/1756-185x.12358 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philip C. Robinson, Paul Bird, Irwin Lim, Nivene Saad, Lionel Schachna, Andrew L. Taylor, Samuel L. Whittle, Matthew A. Brown |
Abstract |
Non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) is axial inflammatory arthritis where plain radiographic damage is not evident. An unknown proportion of these patients will progress to ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The increasing recognition of nr-axSpA has been greatly assisted by the widespread use of magnetic resonance imaging. The aim of this article was to construct a set of consensus statements based on a literature review to guide investigation and promote best management of nr-axSpA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
Researcher | 8 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 25% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
Psychology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2014.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from APLAR Journal of Rheumatology
#634
of 1,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,053
of 238,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from APLAR Journal of Rheumatology
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,287 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.