↓ Skip to main content

Food Insecurity and Aging Outcomes in Older Adults Living with HIV

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Food Insecurity and Aging Outcomes in Older Adults Living with HIV
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, June 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10461-017-1838-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy A. Hessol, Roland Zepf, Elizabeth Zobell, Sheri D. Weiser, Malcolm D. John

Abstract

Little is known about food insecurity and its association with geriatric outcomes in older people living with HIV (PLWH). This was a cross-sectional study of 230 HIV-infected patients aged 50 and older recruited in December 2012 through June 2016. Poisson logistic regression models estimated the prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between food insecurity and the following geriatric outcomes: frailty, physical health and function, social support, mental health and cognition, and behavioral health. 157 (68%) participants were food secure, 35 (15%) had low food security, and 38 (17%) had very low food security. After adjusting the analyses for other significant covariates, at risk alcohol or drug use (PR = 3.14; 95% CI 1.75-5.64), being sedentary (PR = 3.30; 95% CI 1.09-10.00) depressive symptoms (PR = 1.77; 95% CI 1.13-2.76), and dependent instrumental activities of daily living (PR = 2.46; 95% CI 1.13-5.36) were significantly associated with very low food security. These results highlight a need for structural HIV interventions that incorporate targeted food assistance strategies for older PLWH.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 25 18%
Unknown 44 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 15%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Psychology 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 51 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#16,016,149
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#2,506
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,945
of 317,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#59
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.