↓ Skip to main content

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002140.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noelle O'Rourke, Marta Roqué i Figuls, Nuria Farré Bernadó, Fergus Macbeth

Abstract

This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 4, 2004. The use of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might be seen as a way of increasing the effectiveness of radical radiotherapy at the same time as reducing the risks of metastatic disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 160 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 21%
Other 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Other 43 25%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 67%
Unspecified 24 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,665,058
of 13,543,741 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,538
of 10,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,024
of 190,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,543,741 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.