You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A double blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of post-retrieval propranolol on reconsolidation of memory for craving and cue reactivity in cocaine dependent humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychopharmacology, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00213-013-3039-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael E. Saladin, Kevin M. Gray, Aimee L. McRae-Clark, Steven D. LaRowe, Sharon D. Yeatts, Nathaniel L. Baker, Karen J. Hartwell, Kathleen T. Brady |
| Abstract |
This study examined the effects of propranolol vs. placebo, administered immediately after a "retrieval" session of cocaine cue exposure (CCE), on craving and physiological responses occurring 24 h later during a subsequent "test" session of CCE. It was hypothesized that compared to placebo-treated cocaine-dependent (CD) individuals, propranolol-treated CD individuals would evidence attenuated craving and physiological reactivity during the test session. Secondarily, it was expected that group differences identified in the test session would be evident at a 1-week follow-up CCE session. Exploratory analyses of treatment effects on cocaine use were also performed at follow-up. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 19% |
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 47 | 42% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,676,675
of 24,831,063 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#4,263
of 5,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,642
of 199,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#43
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,831,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,571 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.