↓ Skip to main content

Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
393 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
405 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems in primary care: an observational study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelvin P Jordan, Umesh T Kadam, Richard Hayward, Mark Porcheret, Catherine Young, Peter Croft

Abstract

Regional musculoskeletal pain such as back or shoulder pain are commonly reported symptoms in the community. The extent of consultation to primary care with such problems is unknown as a variety of labels may be used to record such consultations. The objective was to classify musculoskeletal morbidity codes used in routine primary care by body region, and to determine the annual consultation prevalence of regional musculoskeletal problems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 405 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 398 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 18%
Student > Bachelor 49 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 10%
Researcher 30 7%
Student > Postgraduate 29 7%
Other 81 20%
Unknown 103 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 141 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 17%
Sports and Recreations 16 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 42 10%
Unknown 119 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,394,564
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#223
of 4,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,353
of 108,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.