You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Is New for an Old Molecule? Systematic Review and Recommendations on the Use of Resveratrol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0019881 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ole Vang, Nihal Ahmad, Clifton A. Baile, Joseph A. Baur, Karen Brown, Anna Csiszar, Dipak K. Das, Dominique Delmas, Carmem Gottfried, Hung-Yun Lin, Qing-Yong Ma, Partha Mukhopadhyay, Namasivayam Nalini, John M. Pezzuto, Tristan Richard, Yogeshwer Shukla, Young-Joon Surh, Thomas Szekeres, Tomasz Szkudelski, Thomas Walle, Joseph M. Wu |
| Abstract |
Resveratrol is a natural compound suggested to have beneficial health effects. However, people are consuming resveratrol for this reason without having the adequate scientific evidence for its effects in humans. Therefore, scientific valid recommendations concerning the human intake of resveratrol based on available published scientific data are necessary. Such recommendations were formulated after the Resveratrol 2010 conference, held in September 2010 in Helsingør, Denmark. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 437 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 415 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 71 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 16% |
| Researcher | 57 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 12% |
| Other | 28 | 6% |
| Other | 90 | 21% |
| Unknown | 72 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 105 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 26 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 58 | 13% |
| Unknown | 98 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#315,688
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,668
of 195,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#966
of 101,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#43
of 1,872 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,872 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.