You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Associated with Drugs and Vaccines in Children: A Case-Control Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0068231 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Umberto Raucci, Rossella Rossi, Roberto Da Cas, Concita Rafaniello, Nadia Mores, Giulia Bersani, Antonino Reale, Nicola Pirozzi, Francesca Menniti-Ippolito, Giuseppe Traversa, Italian Multicenter Study Group for Vaccine Safety in Drug and Children |
| Abstract |
Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) is one of the most severe muco-cutaneous diseases and its occurrence is often attributed to drug use. The aim of the present study is to quantify the risk of SJS in association with drug and vaccine use in children. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Thailand | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 52% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,096,801
of 24,831,063 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#25,994
of 215,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,294
of 199,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#647
of 4,701 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,831,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,701 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.