↓ Skip to main content

Antithrombotic prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation in an Italian real-world setting: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antithrombotic prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation in an Italian real-world setting: a retrospective study
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s136009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ermini, Giuliano, Perrone, Valentina, Veronesi, Chiara, Degli Esposti, Luca, Di Pasquale, Giuseppe

Abstract

The aims of this study were to assess the prevalence of diagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF), the drug use in patients with AF in terms of antithrombotic (AT) strategies used and the compliance with treatment, and to describe the characteristics of patients affected by AF in relation to treatment. The data collected were provided from databases of general practitioners (GPs) of the Local Health Unit of Bologna in Italy. From January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2012, all subjects aged ≥18 years followed by the 44 GPs enrolled in the study were evaluated, and the subjects with a diagnosis of AF were included in the analysis. From 2009 to 2012, we identified 1,413 patients with a diagnosis of AF (2.09% of 67,517 patients of the 44 GPs). A total of 1,413 patients with a diagnosis of AF (2.09% of 67,517 patients of the 44 GPs) were enrolled in the study. During the study, 14% of the enrolled patients did not receive any prescription of ATs, 30% and 39.56% were treated only with antiplatelet (AP) agents and oral anticoagulants (OACs), respectively, and 16.28% of the patients received prescriptions for both an OAC and an AP agent; of the patients receiving prescriptions for both, only 4.17% received these therapies at the same time. Among the OAC users, the percentage of patients still on treatment with the index drug during the last 3 months of observation was 76.9%. Our findings emphasize that in an Italian real-world setting, the burden of AF in general population from a public health point of view underscores the need for improvement in utilization of appropriate ATs in patients with known AF.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 18 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2017.
All research outputs
#14,948,254
of 22,992,311 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#473
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,040
of 314,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,992,311 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.